Using Nonprofit Data to Find Your Next Major Donor

April 18, 2017 Steve MacLaughlin


This article was originally published on npENGAGE

Relationship building with donors is an art. But we also know that there is a science to donor segmentation and the use of analytics.

The use of analytics helps to remove a lot of guesswork around which donors have the most affinity for your cause—analytics can help you determine which donors are more likely to give to your organization.

These insights can be surfaced and used to help your nonprofit make better decisions. The key is moving from simply collecting data to actually leveraging your nonprofit’s data in the right ways. In doing so, you’re likely to find something very valuable right in front of you that you never knew existed.

Here are three important components to thinking like a data driven nonprofit:

Find Meaning in Your Nonprofit Data

Nearly a decade ago, Walmart wanted to understand what happened in their stores when a major storm came through town. What items do customers purchase in a time of need? They analyzed petabytes of data and something popped in the results: Pop-Tarts. Specifically, strawberry Pop-Tarts. As it turned out, sales of strawberry Pop-Tarts increased seven times their normal sales rate ahead of a hurricane. You could have asked store managers or associates the same question and it is highly unlikely that any of them would have said strawberry Pop-Tarts. Their answers were likely to be anecdotal in nature and we should know by now that the plural of anecdote is not data.

Today, the ability to use data to answer important questions is the new normal. This is no longer science fiction. Continued advances in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and prescriptive analytics allow organizations to make meaning out of mountains of data. Knowing what’s possible leads to a simple but important question every nonprofit should be asking: What is the strawberry Pop-Tart hiding in our data?

Perhaps it’s what makes some donors more generous than others. It might be what all your loyal members have in common. There could be indicators that help prioritize prospects for a capital campaign gift. It may illuminate which attributes lead to better email response rates. What do first-time $1,000 donors have in common in our data?

Data, analytics, and artificial intelligence can help nonprofits of all sizes and missions find their own strawberry Pop-Tarts (or future major donors). They can identify patterns and signals from all the noise to create value for their organizations.

But how do nonprofits make meaning out of all their data? How can they understand what works and what still needs improvement? How do they find their very own strawberry Pop-Tart hidden amongst all their data? There is a temptation to start using all the available technology, but this is likely to result in some frustration.

The best place to begin any data exploration is to ask the right questions:

  • What problem are you trying to solve?
  • What value are you trying to create?
  • How will you measure success?
  • Who benefits by getting the answer right or wrong?

Starting with the right questions often leads to more questions, but that’s OK. This is a data journey and we’re just at the beginning.

Turn Your Data Insights into Action

The next step is to take the right questions and using them to turn data insights into action. Yes, this will require some analysis, elbow grease, and data know-how. Thankfully, there is some helpful research to help point nonprofits in the right direction.

Target Analytics, a division of Blackbaud, looked at the giving patterns of more than 5 million donors and identified insights into what influenced them making their first $1,000 gift to a nonprofit. These were existing donors to more than 100 nonprofit organizations. As it turns out, how donors made their first gift and the number of years they had been giving had a significant influence on when they made their first $1,000 donation.

First, the research looked into the source of the first gift these future $1,000 donors made to the organization.

  • 48% of these donors made their first gift through direct mail
  • 29% through telemarketing
  • 10% through special events.
  • Only 5% of first gifts were attributed to social media.

Your own nonprofit’s first gift sources may be different, but at least now you know where to start looking. Knowing this can help nonprofits focus their efforts and prioritize certain engagement channels.

Second, the other thing that popped in the data was how many years of prior giving happened before the first $1,000 gift was made.

  • 14% of $1,000 donors made that gift after seven years of prior giving.
  • 21% made the gift in year eight.

It does not take a lot of data science wizardry to run your own analysis on current $1,000 donors and the year they made those gifts. Finding a pattern can help you to take action on the information.

Finally, even with this research we need to be careful not to confuse correlation with causation. Will nearly half of your donors be acquired through direct mail and almost a quarter of them make a $1,000 gift in their eight year of giving? Not necessarily. The findings are more descriptive than predictive. But now you’re thinking like a data driven nonprofit, which is a good sign.

A version of this article was originally published on Huffington Post.


Previous Article
Four Trends to Follow at AFP’s 2017 International Fundraising Conference
Four Trends to Follow at AFP’s 2017 International Fundraising Conference

Here are the four key trends we’ll be following at the conference, and a few can’t-miss sessions that promi...

Next Article
How Nonprofits Can Build Trust with Strong Internal Controls
How Nonprofits Can Build Trust with Strong Internal Controls

How are trust and internal controls intertwined? That is what we will explore in this article.


Sign up to our mailing list to receive industry trends and information!

First Name
Last Name
Organization Name
Solution Area of Interest
Thanks for signing up!
Error - something went wrong!